« I never wondered about this. | Main | Fuck. »

Not safe for the prefering of proper sentence types


Originally uploaded by Tsjeu

Dear gods. I am in that ridiculously stupid place where a long ranty email makes me actually squee out loud. I embarass myself.

stinkyboy kitchenfascist - a subspecies of
anarchist - usually young white males- primarily concerned with sitting
in the kitchens of punk houses, squats, logging camps, student union
buildings, girlfriend's houses, (basically anywhere they can freeload)
and blockades to talk shit. their primary political function is to annoy
the shit out of everyone doing good work, and to remind people with
heart and sincereity of what they don't want to be by being
self-righteous moralistic dickheads with their nose in everyone's
business and a finger each in bakhunin texts and everyone else's dinner
plates.

In other news I was really cranky tonight. I'm less so now (see squeeing reference). I actually do talk a lot...just not to the people who tell me I don't talk much. It never fails, somehow. I have tomatoes and basil and johnny jumpups and tomatillos, and and and. Tomorrow I plant and figure out how to condense an 8 year process into 8 days. and how to get a javanese water buffallo shipped within that time as well. I need horn and hide people, work with me.

uh, I don't seem to be able to write decently anymore. Good thing I chose an artsy, non writing, eight year long project! Heh heh heh.

I'm arguing about situationism via email and it makes me happy. All you wonderful intellectuals are turning me into one of you!!! AAAAAAAIIIiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!

*runs away*

Comments

there is no situationism!

no?

nope, aside from the obvious, it was entirely invalidated when chapters began stocking society of the spectacle.

well, I don't even properly know what it is, so I'll find out - it's fun reading if only because it makes me want to slap the author (Raoul Vaneigem) and then perhaps laugh at myself.

it's not supposed to be an 'ism'.

i'd hate to see what you'd want to do to guy debord.

Also, as far as I can tell it's a way of looking at things, so there's no way it can cease to exist unless absolutely everyone forgets about it. :P

re: not supposed to be an 'ism' - yeah, but it seems to be referred to as that from time to time. I'm still not seeing the whole 'having to do with the theory or practical activity of constructing situations' but I'm only a little way in.

I'm so far behind in my knowledge of most political/artistic movements that I feel at a distinct disadvantage...

guy debord....? hmm. perhaps after I've finished this one.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)